Current book: None
Pages read: None
My book has not yet been returned to the library. Come on, random person. You have like $3.50 in fines by now. Cough up the goods already.
Regarding the Scientology expose - I've decided that I'm annoyed by the fact that there aren't citations. She's got a huge bibliography in the thing, and a bunch of notes at the end, but there aren't any superscripts to indicate where those notes might correspond to the text. Her footnotes are purely to add asides and clarification, but don't offer any sources, or at least not sources that are cited in an academic fashion. (They'll say something like, "The Church denies this.") It's lazy and it undermines the legitimacy of her research. You would think, when she spent this much time investigating the thing, she'd want it to come across as rigorous and meticulous. Apparently not. So if you, dear reader, decide to write a book that relies heavily on source material, don't be as ass - cite.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
A Clockwork Orange
(5)
A Good Man Is Hard to Find
(4)
A Passage to India
(6)
A Room with a View
(3)
A Separate Peace
(2)
Absalom Absalom
(6)
Achebe
(5)
Adams
(3)
All the King's Men
(8)
An American Tragedy
(17)
Atlas Shrugged
(16)
Babbitt
(8)
back from hiatus
(1)
baking
(11)
Baldwin
(4)
Baum
(3)
Bonfire of the Vanities
(6)
borderline
(12)
Brideshead Revisited
(9)
Burgess
(5)
Burroughs
(1)
canon
(1)
Capote
(6)
Cat's Cradle
(3)
Cather
(19)
cheesecake
(4)
Chopin
(4)
Conrad
(5)
cooking
(25)
Death Comes for the Archbishop
(6)
DeLillo
(6)
Dreiser
(17)
du Maurier
(2)
Edith Wharton
(1)
emergency
(2)
Ethan Frome
(1)
excuses
(141)
Faulkner
(9)
Felicia DeSmith
(3)
Finnegan's Wake
(1)
Fitzgerald
(24)
For Whom the Bell Tolls
(3)
Forster
(19)
Fowles
(7)
Franny and Zooey
(2)
Go Tell It on the Mountain
(4)
Grahame
(2)
Guest post
(3)
Hammett
(2)
Hemingway
(5)
hiatus
(4)
holiday
(5)
horrible
(4)
Howards End
(6)
In Cold Blood
(6)
In Our Time
(1)
Irving
(6)
James
(25)
Jazz
(1)
Joyce
(1)
Keneally
(7)
Kerouac
(5)
Kim
(7)
Kipling
(7)
Knowles
(2)
Lady Chatterly's Lover
(6)
Lawrence
(26)
Lewis
(13)
Light in August
(3)
London
(3)
Look Homeward Angel
(9)
Lord Jim
(5)
Mailer
(7)
Main Street
(5)
Midnight's Children
(9)
Miller
(6)
Morrison
(1)
Mrs. Dalloway
(3)
My Antonia
(6)
not a novel
(4)
O Pioneers
(7)
O'Connor
(4)
On the Road
(5)
Orlando
(4)
other books
(7)
page updates
(1)
Rabbit Run
(4)
Rand
(24)
Rebecca
(2)
recap
(1)
Rhys
(6)
Rushdie
(18)
Salinger
(2)
Schindler's List
(7)
Sinclair
(6)
Sons And Lovers
(12)
Sophie's Choice
(10)
Star Trek
(1)
Stein
(5)
Styron
(10)
Tender is the Night
(10)
The Age of Innocence
(4)
The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas
(5)
The Awakening
(4)
The Beautiful and the Damned
(8)
The Bostonians
(9)
The Call of the Wild
(3)
The Fellowship of the Ring
(5)
The Fountainhead
(8)
The French Lieutenant's Woman
(7)
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
(2)
The Jungle
(6)
The Lord of the Rings
(16)
The Maltese Falcon
(2)
The Naked and the Dead
(7)
The Naked Lunch
(1)
The Old Man and the Sea
(1)
The Portrait of a Lady
(10)
The Return of the King
(6)
The Satanic Verses
(9)
The Two Towers
(5)
The War of the Worlds
(4)
The Wind in the Willows
(2)
The Wings of the Dove
(6)
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
(3)
The World According to Garp
(6)
Things Fall Apart
(6)
This Side of Paradise
(6)
Thomas Wolfe
(9)
To the Lighthouse
(3)
Tolkien
(16)
Tom Wolfe
(6)
Triv
(2)
Tropic of Cancer
(6)
unworthy
(33)
Updike
(4)
vacation
(2)
Vonnegut
(3)
Warren
(8)
Waugh
(9)
Wells
(4)
Wharton
(4)
Where Angels Fear to Tread
(4)
White Noise
(6)
Wide Sargasso Sea
(6)
Women In Love
(8)
Woolf
(10)
worthy
(25)
How academic of you. I think it's a problem generally with "pop" history/biography/nonfiction. In fact, you could say it's the thing which separates books designed more for an academic audience from those for general public consumption. There are exceptions, of course - but I think most people are neither curious enough to check sources or sophisticated enough to recognize the role of sources (or that they even exist).
ReplyDelete